Transparency alternatives to Tookan
Other Route planning and delivery vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Tookan. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 64 that differ from Tookan on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Tookan has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Tookan” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Tookan | Found at Tookan, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RideCorideco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RideCo | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Lytxlytx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lytx | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| NextBillion.ainextbillion.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to NextBillion.ai | 48/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Badger Mapsbadgermapping.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Badger Maps | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| Routalroutal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Routal | 43/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| Navixynavixy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Navixy | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| One Step GPSonestepgps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to One Step GPS | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| FTS GPSftsgps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FTS GPS | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Nautonauto.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nauto | 30/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Trackunittrackunit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trackunit | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| ABAXabax.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ABAX | 17/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Detrackdetrack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Detrack | 17/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.