Alternatives to Coveo
Other Search and vector infrastructure vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Coveo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Coveo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Coveo has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Coveo does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Coveo does not | Coveo publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chromatrychroma.com | 74/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Pineconepinecone.io | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Gleanglean.com | 57/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +4 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Addsearchaddsearch.com | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Dashworksdashworks.ai | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Hebbiahebbia.ai | 39/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Meilisearchmeilisearch.com | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Constructorconstructor.com | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Doofinderdoofinder.com | 35/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Metalgetmetal.io | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Sinequasinequa.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Zillizzilliz.com | 30/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.