Transparency alternatives to OnCrawl
Other SEO tools vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at OnCrawl. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from OnCrawl on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
OnCrawl has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at OnCrawl” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at OnCrawl | Found at OnCrawl, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Web Rankingadvancedwebranking.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Advanced Web Ranking | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Mangoolsmangools.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mangools | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ahrefsahrefs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ahrefs | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| seoClarityseoclarity.netSee also Transparency alternatives to seoClarity | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Conductorconductor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conductor | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Rankfor.AIrankfor.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rankfor.AI | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| DataForSEOdataforseo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DataForSEO | 32/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| AccuRankeraccuranker.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AccuRanker | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Dragon Metricsdragonmetrics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dragon Metrics | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sitecheckersitechecker.proSee also Transparency alternatives to Sitechecker | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Mozmoz.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Moz | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| SE Rankingseranking.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SE Ranking | 23/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.