Transparency alternatives to Sitechecker
Other SEO tools vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Sitechecker. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 43 that differ from Sitechecker on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Sitechecker has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Sitechecker” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Sitechecker | Found at Sitechecker, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Web Rankingadvancedwebranking.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Advanced Web Ranking | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Conductorconductor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conductor | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Ahrefsahrefs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ahrefs | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Mangoolsmangools.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mangools | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Rankfor.AIrankfor.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rankfor.AI | 35/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| seoClarityseoclarity.netSee also Transparency alternatives to seoClarity | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Mozmoz.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Moz | 26/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| OnCrawloncrawl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OnCrawl | 23/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Keytrendskeytrends.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Keytrends | 22/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| SerpApiserpapi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SerpApi | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| BrightEdgebrightedge.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BrightEdge | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Seobilityseobility.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Seobility | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.