Transparency alternatives to Sistrix
Other SEO tools vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Sistrix. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Sistrix on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Sistrix has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Sistrix” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Sistrix | Found at Sistrix, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahrefsahrefs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ahrefs | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Advanced Web Rankingadvancedwebranking.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Advanced Web Ranking | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Mangoolsmangools.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mangools | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Rankfor.AIrankfor.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rankfor.AI | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| seoClarityseoclarity.netSee also Transparency alternatives to seoClarity | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Conductorconductor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conductor | 26/100 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Mozmoz.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Moz | 26/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| OnCrawloncrawl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OnCrawl | 23/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Keytrendskeytrends.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Keytrends | 22/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| BrightEdgebrightedge.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BrightEdge | 17/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| DataForSEOdataforseo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DataForSEO | 32/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| AccuRankeraccuranker.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AccuRanker | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.