SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to ShipStation

Other Shipping and logistics vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at ShipStation. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 79 that differ from ShipStation on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

ShipStation has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at ShipStation” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at ShipStationFound at ShipStation, not found there
AfterShipaftership.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AfterShip 83/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Sendcloudsendcloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sendcloud 70/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Metapackmetapack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Metapack 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
FourKitesfourkites.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FourKites 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Bringgbringg.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bringg 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Elromcoelromco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elromco 39/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Locuslocus.shSee also Transparency alternatives to Locus 35/100 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Quivoquivo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Quivo 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
parcelLabparcellab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to parcelLab 26/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Intrisintris.beSee also Transparency alternatives to Intris 22/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Shipwireshipwire.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shipwire 22/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 Compare
Easyshipeasyship.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easyship 43/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.