Transparency alternatives to Seven Senders
Other Shipping and logistics vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Seven Senders. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 80 that differ from Seven Senders on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Seven Senders has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Seven Senders” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Seven Senders | Found at Seven Senders, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AfterShipaftership.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AfterShip | 83/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Sendcloudsendcloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sendcloud | 70/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Metapackmetapack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Metapack | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Elromcoelromco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elromco | 39/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Locuslocus.shSee also Transparency alternatives to Locus | 35/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| FourKitesfourkites.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FourKites | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Bringgbringg.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bringg | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Easyshipeasyship.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easyship | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Quivoquivo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Quivo | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Shippogoshippo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shippo | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| parcelLabparcellab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to parcelLab | 26/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Cargosoncargoson.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cargoson | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.