Transparency alternatives to Freightos
Other Shipping and logistics vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Freightos. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 81 that differ from Freightos on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Freightos has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Freightos” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Freightos | Found at Freightos, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AfterShipaftership.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AfterShip | 83/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Sendcloudsendcloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sendcloud | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Bringgbringg.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bringg | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Metapackmetapack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Metapack | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| parcelLabparcellab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to parcelLab | 35/100 | 4 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Quivoquivo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Quivo | 35/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| FourKitesfourkites.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FourKites | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Easyshipeasyship.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easyship | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Elromcoelromco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elromco | 26/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Intrisintris.beSee also Transparency alternatives to Intris | 22/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Centirocentiro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Centiro | 17/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Flexportflexport.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flexport | 17/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.