Transparency alternatives to Ryvr
Other Staffing agency software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Ryvr. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from Ryvr on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Ryvr has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Ryvr” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Ryvr | Found at Ryvr, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kordiskordisai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kordis | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Loxoloxo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Loxo | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Recruit CRMrecruitcrm.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Recruit CRM | 41/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Crelatecrelate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crelate | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Firefishfirefishsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Firefish | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Recruiterflowrecruiterflow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Recruiterflow | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Bilflobilflo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bilflo | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Gemgem.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gem | 35/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Beamerybeamery.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beamery | 30/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Tempworkstempworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tempworks | 22/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Haufe Umantisumantis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Haufe Umantis | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Hireflowhireflow.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hireflow | 26/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.