Alternatives to Ghost Inspector
Other Test automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Ghost Inspector does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from Ghost Inspector on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Ghost Inspector has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Ghost Inspector does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Ghost Inspector does not | Ghost Inspector publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cypresscypress.io | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| PractiTestpractitest.com | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Applitoolsapplitools.com | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| ACCELQaccelq.com | 39/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| BrowserStackbrowserstack.com | 63/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Katalonkatalon.com | 48/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Applauseapplause.com | 39/100 | 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Rainforest QArainforestqa.com | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Allure TestOpsqameta.io | 30/100 | 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Endtestendtest.io | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Global App Testingglobalapptesting.com | 39/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Xraygetxray.app | 39/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.