SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Keila

Other Transactional email and notifications vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Keila does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from Keila on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Keila has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Keila does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Keila does notKeila publishes, and they do not
Resendresend.com 83/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +5 nothing Compare
Mailosaurmailosaur.com 74/100 8 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +5 nothing Compare
Streamgetstream.io 48/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 1 Data location stated Compare
Ablyably.com 39/100 6 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 1 Data location stated Compare
Knockknock.app 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Mailtrapmailtrap.io 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
ClickSendclicksend.com 35/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
Couriercourier.com 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Novunovu.co 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Plunkuseplunk.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
Bentobentonow.com 43/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Copernicacopernica.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.