SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Localizely

Other Translation and localization vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Localizely. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 33 that differ from Localizely on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Localizely has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Localizely” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at LocalizelyFound at Localizely, not found there
Lokaliselokalise.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lokalise 87/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +5 nothing Compare
wxrkswxrks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to wxrks 70/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 1 Data location stated Compare
Transifextransifex.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Transifex 61/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
LingoHublingohub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LingoHub 74/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Locizelocize.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Locize 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 nothing Compare
Smartcatsmartcat.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smartcat 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Crowdincrowdin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crowdin 43/100 5 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 1 Public pricing Compare
DeepLdeepl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DeepL 48/100 4 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Traduoratraduora.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Traduora 43/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Wordbeewordbee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wordbee 39/100 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Phrasephrase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Phrase 39/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Weglotweglot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Weglot 39/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.