Transparency alternatives to Wevo
Other User research and testing vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Wevo. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Wevo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Wevo has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Wevo” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Wevo | Found at Wevo, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| User Interviewsuserinterviews.comSee also Transparency alternatives to User Interviews | 83/100 | 10 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +7 | nothing | Compare |
| Attention Insightattentioninsight.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Attention Insight | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Ballparkballparkhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ballpark | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Graingrain.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Grain | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Great Questiongreatquestion.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Great Question | 43/100 | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| UXArmyuxarmy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UXArmy | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Condenscondens.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Condens | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| UserTestingusertesting.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UserTesting | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Aureliusaureliuslab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aurelius | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Heliohelio.zurb.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Helio | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Useberryuseberry.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Useberry | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Userbrainuserbrain.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Userbrain | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.