Transparency alternatives to Zoom
Other Video conferencing vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Zoom. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 23 that differ from Zoom on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Zoom has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Zoom” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Zoom | Found at Zoom, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pexippexip.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pexip | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Dialpaddialpad.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dialpad | 57/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Livestormlivestorm.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Livestorm | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| TeamViewer Meetingteamviewer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TeamViewer Meeting | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Wirewire.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wire | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Alfaviewalfaview.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alfaview | 35/100 | 3 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Sherpanysherpany.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sherpany | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Elementelement.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Element | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Wherebywhereby.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Whereby | 32/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Zoho Meetingzoho.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zoho Meeting | 17/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Dailydaily.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Daily | 48/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Demiodemio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Demio | 43/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.