SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Dialpad

Other Video conferencing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Dialpad does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 20 that differ from Dialpad on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Dialpad has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Dialpad does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Dialpad does notDialpad publishes, and they do not
Dailydaily.co 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Pexippexip.com 65/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 Public pricing Compare
Demiodemio.com 43/100 1 Subprocessor list 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Restreamrestream.io 43/100 1 Subprocessor list 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Zoomzoom.com 43/100 1 Subprocessor list 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Alfaviewalfaview.com 35/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Livestormlivestorm.co 50/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Certifications named Compare
TeamViewer Meetingteamviewer.com 43/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Public pricing Compare
Wirewire.com 39/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Elementelement.io 35/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Wherebywhereby.com 32/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
GoTogoto.com 30/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.