Alternatives to Sherpany
Other Video conferencing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Sherpany does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 21 that differ from Sherpany on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Sherpany has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Sherpany does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Sherpany does not | Sherpany publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pexippexip.com | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Dailydaily.co | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Zoomzoom.com | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Dialpaddialpad.com | 55/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Demiodemio.com | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Restreamrestream.io | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Livestormlivestorm.co | 50/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| TeamViewer Meetingteamviewer.com | 43/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Wirewire.com | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Alfaviewalfaview.com | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Wherebywhereby.com | 32/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| GoTogoto.com | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.