SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to TeamViewer Meeting

Other Video conferencing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that TeamViewer Meeting does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 20 that differ from TeamViewer Meeting on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

TeamViewer Meeting has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and TeamViewer Meeting does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and TeamViewer Meeting does notTeamViewer Meeting publishes, and they do not
Pexippexip.com 65/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Dailydaily.co 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Demiodemio.com 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Restreamrestream.io 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Zoomzoom.com 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Alfaviewalfaview.com 35/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Dialpaddialpad.com 55/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
Livestormlivestorm.co 50/100 1 Public pricing 1 Certifications named Compare
Wirewire.com 39/100 1 Public pricing 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
GoTogoto.com 30/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Gathergather.town 26/100 1 Public pricing 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
StreamYardstreamyard.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.