SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Biteable

Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Biteable does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 50 that differ from Biteable on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Biteable has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Biteable does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Biteable does notBiteable publishes, and they do not
Simplecastsimplecast.com 78/100 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
WeVideowevideo.com 70/100 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Loomloom.com 61/100 6 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 nothing Compare
Muxmux.com 52/100 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Vimeovimeo.com 43/100 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing Compare
api.videoapi.video 65/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
JWXjwx.com 57/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 1 Public pricing Compare
Vidyardvidyard.com 57/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 1 Public pricing Compare
Auphonicauphonic.com 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Dacastdacast.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Movingimagemovingimage.com 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing Compare
Cleanvoicecleanvoice.ai 48/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.