SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to JWX

Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at JWX. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 49 that differ from JWX on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

JWX has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at JWX” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at JWXFound at JWX, not found there
Muxmux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mux 52/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
WeVideowevideo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WeVideo 70/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Loomloom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Loom 61/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Dacastdacast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dacast 43/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Vimeovimeo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vimeo 43/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Auphonicauphonic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Auphonic 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare
SproutVideosproutvideo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SproutVideo 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Simplecastsimplecast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simplecast 78/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Transistortransistor.fmSee also Transparency alternatives to Transistor 57/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Vidyardvidyard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vidyard 57/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Tellatella.tvSee also Transparency alternatives to Tella 48/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Acastacast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Acast 35/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.