Transparency alternatives to Cleanvoice
Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Cleanvoice. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 49 that differ from Cleanvoice on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Cleanvoice has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Cleanvoice” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Cleanvoice | Found at Cleanvoice, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muxmux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mux | 52/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Vimeovimeo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vimeo | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Simplecastsimplecast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simplecast | 78/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| WeVideowevideo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WeVideo | 70/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Loomloom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Loom | 61/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Vidyardvidyard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vidyard | 57/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| api.videoapi.videoSee also Transparency alternatives to api.video | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| JWXjwx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to JWX | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Dacastdacast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dacast | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Movingimagemovingimage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Movingimage | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Transistortransistor.fmSee also Transparency alternatives to Transistor | 57/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Tellatella.tvSee also Transparency alternatives to Tella | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.