Alternatives to Cleanvoice
Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Cleanvoice does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 28 that differ from Cleanvoice on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Cleanvoice has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Cleanvoice does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Cleanvoice does not | Cleanvoice publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loomloom.com | 74/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Muxmux.com | 52/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 3 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| api.videoapi.video | 78/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Vidyardvidyard.com | 57/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Descriptdescript.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| JW Playerjwplayer.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Brightcovebrightcove.com | 22/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Auphonicauphonic.com | 52/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Podbeanpodbean.com | 36/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Dacastdacast.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Captivatecaptivate.fm | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Muvimuvi.com | 26/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.