SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Gumlet

Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Gumlet. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 49 that differ from Gumlet on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Gumlet has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Gumlet” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at GumletFound at Gumlet, not found there
Simplecastsimplecast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simplecast 78/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
WeVideowevideo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WeVideo 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Vidyardvidyard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vidyard 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
api.videoapi.videoSee also Transparency alternatives to api.video 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Loomloom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Loom 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
JWXjwx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to JWX 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Transistortransistor.fmSee also Transparency alternatives to Transistor 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Muxmux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mux 52/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Vimeovimeo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vimeo 43/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Tellatella.tvSee also Transparency alternatives to Tella 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Dacastdacast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dacast 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Movingimagemovingimage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Movingimage 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.