Transparency alternatives to Podbean
Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Podbean. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 47 that differ from Podbean on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Podbean has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Podbean” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Podbean | Found at Podbean, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| api.videoapi.videoSee also Transparency alternatives to api.video | 78/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Simplecastsimplecast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simplecast | 78/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| JWXjwx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to JWX | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| WeVideowevideo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WeVideo | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Vidyardvidyard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vidyard | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Loomloom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Loom | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Transistortransistor.fmSee also Transparency alternatives to Transistor | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Muxmux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mux | 52/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Descriptdescript.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Descript | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Dacastdacast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dacast | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Vimeovimeo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vimeo | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Movingimagemovingimage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Movingimage | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.