Transparency alternatives to Ecoprog
Other Waste management software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Ecoprog. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from Ecoprog on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Ecoprog has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Ecoprog” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Ecoprog | Found at Ecoprog, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tegostegos-group.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tegos | 22/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Resourcifyresourcify.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Resourcify | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Sap Wasteprologa.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Sap Waste | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Wasteboxwastebox.bizSee also Transparency alternatives to Wastebox | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Reclayreclay-group.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reclay | 18/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Rubiconrubicon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rubicon | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Zentekzentek.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Zentek | 17/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Landbelllandbell.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Landbell | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Recycle Track Systemsrts.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Recycle Track Systems | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| SIA Ecosolveinsia.itSee also Transparency alternatives to SIA Ecosolve | 4/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| AMCSamcsgroup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AMCS | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Basestationthebasestation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Basestation | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.