SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Tegos

Other Waste management software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Tegos does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Tegos on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Tegos has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Tegos does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Tegos does notTegos publishes, and they do not
Ecoprogecoprog.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Rubiconrubicon.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Resourcifyresourcify.de 26/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Sap Wasteprologa.de 26/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Cyclizecyclize.de 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Reclayreclay-group.com 18/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Landbelllandbell.de 13/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
AMCSamcsgroup.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Der Gruene Punktgruener-punkt.de 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Interzerointerzero.de 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Recycle Track Systemsrts.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Red-on-linered-on-line.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.