SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Sap Waste

Other Waste management software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Sap Waste does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 20 that differ from Sap Waste on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Sap Waste has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Sap Waste does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Sap Waste does notSap Waste publishes, and they do not
Ecoprogecoprog.com 30/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Rubiconrubicon.com 30/100 1 Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Recycle Track Systemsrts.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Tegostegos-group.com 9/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Resourcifyresourcify.de 26/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Cyclizecyclize.de 22/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Reclayreclay-group.com 18/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Landbelllandbell.de 13/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Data location stated Compare
AMCSamcsgroup.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Der Gruene Punktgruener-punkt.de 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Interzerointerzero.de 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Red-on-linered-on-line.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.