Transparency alternatives to Recycle Track Systems
Other Waste management software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Recycle Track Systems. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from Recycle Track Systems on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Recycle Track Systems has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Recycle Track Systems” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Recycle Track Systems | Found at Recycle Track Systems, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ecoprogecoprog.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ecoprog | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Rubiconrubicon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rubicon | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Resourcifyresourcify.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Resourcify | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Sap Wasteprologa.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Sap Waste | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Wasteboxwastebox.bizSee also Transparency alternatives to Wastebox | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Tegostegos-group.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tegos | 22/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Reclayreclay-group.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reclay | 18/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Zentekzentek.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Zentek | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Landbelllandbell.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Landbell | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| AMCSamcsgroup.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AMCS | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Basestationthebasestation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Basestation | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Cyclizecyclize.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Cyclize | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.