Transparency alternatives to Wastebox
Other Waste management software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Wastebox does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from Wastebox on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Wastebox has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Wastebox does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Wastebox does not | Wastebox publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubiconrubicon.com | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ecoprogecoprog.com | 30/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Resourcifyresourcify.de | 26/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Sap Wasteprologa.de | 26/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Landbelllandbell.de | 13/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| AMCSamcsgroup.com | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Basestationthebasestation.com | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cyclizecyclize.de | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Der Gruene Punktgruener-punkt.de | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Enevoenevo.com | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Interzerointerzero.de | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| PIVOT Systemspivotsystems.au | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.