SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Cyclize

Other Waste management software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Cyclize does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 15 that differ from Cyclize on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Cyclize has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Cyclize does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Cyclize does notCyclize publishes, and they do not
Ecoprogecoprog.com 30/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Resourcifyresourcify.de 26/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Reclayreclay-group.com 18/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Landbelllandbell.de 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
AMCSamcsgroup.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Data location stated Compare
Der Gruene Punktgruener-punkt.de 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Data location stated Compare
Interzerointerzero.de 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Data location stated Compare
Red-on-linered-on-line.com 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Data location stated Compare
Schuettflixschuettflix.de 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Data location stated Compare
Containerdienstcontainerdienst.de 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Deutsche Recyclingdeutsche-recycling.de 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Discovery Softwarediscoverysoftware.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.