Transparency alternatives to Mixpanel
Other Web analytics vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Mixpanel. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from Mixpanel on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Mixpanel has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Mixpanel” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Mixpanel | Found at Mixpanel, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PostHogposthog.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PostHog | 78/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Amplitudeamplitude.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Amplitude | 74/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Contentsquarecontentsquare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Contentsquare | 61/100 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| FullStoryfullstory.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FullStory | 57/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Fathom Analyticsusefathom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fathom Analytics | 52/100 | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Matomomatomo.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Matomo | 52/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Plausibleplausible.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Plausible | 48/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Pirschpirsch.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Pirsch | 35/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Chartbeatchartbeat.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chartbeat | 30/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Swetrixswetrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Swetrix | 61/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Rybbitrybbit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rybbit | 57/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Umamiumami.isSee also Transparency alternatives to Umami | 57/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.