SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to PostHog

Other Web analytics vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at PostHog. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 32 that differ from PostHog on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

PostHog has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at PostHog” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at PostHogFound at PostHog, not found there
Contentsquarecontentsquare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Contentsquare 61/100 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Mixpanelmixpanel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mixpanel 78/100 1 Status page with history 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Amplitudeamplitude.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Amplitude 74/100 1 Status page with history 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Swetrixswetrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Swetrix 61/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
FullStoryfullstory.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FullStory 57/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Fathom Analyticsusefathom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fathom Analytics 52/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Plausibleplausible.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Plausible 48/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Simple Analyticssimpleanalytics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simple Analytics 39/100 1 Status page with history 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 Compare
Pirschpirsch.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Pirsch 35/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 Compare
Chartbeatchartbeat.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chartbeat 30/100 1 Status page with history 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 Compare
Heapheap.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Heap 30/100 1 Status page with history 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 Compare
LogRocketlogrocket.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LogRocket 30/100 1 Status page with history 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.