Alternatives to PostHog
Other Web analytics vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that PostHog does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 24 that differ from PostHog on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
PostHog has 2 gaps in what we could measure: Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and PostHog does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and PostHog does not | PostHog publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixpanelmixpanel.com | 85/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Fathom Analyticsusefathom.com | 65/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Contentsquarecontentsquare.com | 61/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Plausibleplausible.io | 48/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Pirschpirsch.io | 35/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Glassboxglassbox.com | 26/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Beam Analyticsbeamanalytics.io | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Offenoffen.dev | 13/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Amplitudeamplitude.com | 74/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| FullStoryfullstory.com | 57/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Matomomatomo.org | 52/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Simple Analyticssimpleanalytics.com | 45/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.