SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Plausible

Other Web analytics vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Plausible does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Plausible on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Plausible has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Plausible does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Plausible does notPlausible publishes, and they do not
Contentsquarecontentsquare.com 61/100 7 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 Compare
Mixpanelmixpanel.com 85/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
PostHogposthog.com 85/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Amplitudeamplitude.com 74/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
FullStoryfullstory.com 57/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 3 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Heapheap.io 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 Compare
Hotjarhotjar.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 Compare
LogRocketlogrocket.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 Compare
Fathom Analyticsusefathom.com 65/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Matomomatomo.org 52/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Simple Analyticssimpleanalytics.com 45/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Cabinwithcabin.com 33/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.