SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to WordPress.com

Other Website builders vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at WordPress.com. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from WordPress.com on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

WordPress.com has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at WordPress.com” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at WordPress.comFound at WordPress.com, not found there
Glideglideapps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Glide 78/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Unbounceunbounce.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unbounce 78/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Hostingerhostinger.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hostinger 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Squarespacesquarespace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Squarespace 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Ghostghost.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Ghost 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Umsoumso.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Umso 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Elementor Hostingelementor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elementor Hosting 43/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Framerframer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Framer 52/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named nothing Compare
Tildatilda.ccSee also Transparency alternatives to Tilda 41/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Dudaduda.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Duda 30/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Wixwix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wix 30/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Zenfoliozenfolio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zenfolio 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.