SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Typedream

Other Website builders vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Typedream. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Typedream on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Typedream has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Typedream” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at TypedreamFound at Typedream, not found there
Unbounceunbounce.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unbounce 78/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 1 Certifications named Compare
Squarespacesquarespace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Squarespace 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 1 Certifications named Compare
Hostingerhostinger.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hostinger 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Glideglideapps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Glide 78/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 nothing Compare
Elementor Hostingelementor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elementor Hosting 57/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Ghostghost.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Ghost 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Certifications named Compare
Umsoumso.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Umso 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Framerframer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Framer 52/100 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Tildatilda.ccSee also Transparency alternatives to Tilda 41/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Sitejetsitejet.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Sitejet 39/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Dudaduda.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Duda 30/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Zenfoliozenfolio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zenfolio 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.