Transparency alternatives to Next View LMS
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Next View LMS. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 83 that differ from Next View LMS on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Next View LMS has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Next View LMS” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Next View LMS | Found at Next View LMS, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agendrixagendrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agendrix | 70/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Timelytimelyapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Timely | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Time Doctortimedoctor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Time Doctor | 57/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| actiTIMEactitime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to actiTIME | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deputy | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| DeskTimedesktime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DeskTime | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Jibblejibble.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Jibble | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| TimeCamptimecamp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TimeCamp | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Findmyshiftfindmyshift.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Findmyshift | 45/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| RotaCloudrotacloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RotaCloud | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Tempotempo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Tempo | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| 7shifts7shifts.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 7shifts | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.