Transparency alternatives to Next View LMS
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Next View LMS does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 77 that differ from Next View LMS on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Next View LMS has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Next View LMS does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Next View LMS does not | Next View LMS publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agendrixagendrix.com | 70/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Timelytimelyapp.com | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| 7shifts7shifts.com | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| actiTIMEactitime.com | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.com | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| TimeCamptimecamp.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Findmyshiftfindmyshift.com | 45/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| RotaCloudrotacloud.com | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Time Doctortimedoctor.com | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Beebolebeebole.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Hubstaffhubstaff.com | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Jibblejibble.io | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.