Transparency alternatives to Everhour
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Everhour. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 83 that differ from Everhour on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Everhour has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Everhour” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Everhour | Found at Everhour, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agendrixagendrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agendrix | 70/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Timelytimelyapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Timely | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deputy | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Jibblejibble.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Jibble | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| RotaCloudrotacloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RotaCloud | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Time Doctortimedoctor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Time Doctor | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Beebolebeebole.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beebole | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Hubstaffhubstaff.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hubstaff | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Papershiftpapershift.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Papershift | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Rotageekrotageek.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rotageek | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Sonagetsona.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sona | 35/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| 7shifts7shifts.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 7shifts | 33/100 | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.