Transparency alternatives to Lightning Bolt
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Lightning Bolt. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 84 that differ from Lightning Bolt on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Lightning Bolt has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Lightning Bolt” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Lightning Bolt | Found at Lightning Bolt, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agendrixagendrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agendrix | 70/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Timelytimelyapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Timely | 65/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| 7shifts7shifts.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 7shifts | 48/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| actiTIMEactitime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to actiTIME | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deputy | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| RotaCloudrotacloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RotaCloud | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Time Doctortimedoctor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Time Doctor | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Hubstaffhubstaff.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hubstaff | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Meckanomeckano.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Meckano | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| RescueTimerescuetime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RescueTime | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Rotageekrotageek.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rotageek | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Sonagetsona.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sona | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.