Transparency alternatives to Sign In App
Other Workplace and visitor management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Sign In App. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Sign In App on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Sign In App has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Sign In App” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Sign In App | Found at Sign In App, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OfficeRnDofficernd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OfficeRnD | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Teamgoteamgo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamgo | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sinesine.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Sine | 59/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Clearoomsclearooms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clearooms | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| FacilityOSfacilityos.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FacilityOS | 61/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Envoyenvoy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Envoy | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sign In Solutionssigninsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sign In Solutions | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Kadencekadence.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Kadence | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Robinrobinpowered.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Robin | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| Joangetjoan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Joan | 43/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| EZBookezbook.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EZBook | 18/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Cloudbookingcloudbooking.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cloudbooking | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.