Transparency alternatives to Sign In Solutions
Other Workplace and visitor management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Sign In Solutions. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Sign In Solutions on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Sign In Solutions has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Sign In Solutions” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Sign In Solutions | Found at Sign In Solutions, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OfficeRnDofficernd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OfficeRnD | 65/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Teamgoteamgo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamgo | 65/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sinesine.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Sine | 59/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| Robinrobinpowered.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Robin | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Envoyenvoy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Envoy | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kadencekadence.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Kadence | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| FacilityOSfacilityos.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FacilityOS | 61/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Clearoomsclearooms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clearooms | 57/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Sign In Appsigninapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sign In App | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| desk.lydesk.lySee also Transparency alternatives to desk.ly | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Joangetjoan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Joan | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| YAROOMSyarooms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to YAROOMS | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.