SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Aproplan

Other Construction management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Aproplan does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from Aproplan on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Aproplan has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Aproplan does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Aproplan does notAproplan publishes, and they do not
Procoreprocore.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact Compare
Daluxdalux.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Bridgitgobridgit.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Hero Softwarehero-software.de 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Bluebeambluebeam.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Assignarassignar.com 23/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact Compare
SmartPMsmartpmtech.com 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact Compare
Congridcongrid.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Newformanewforma.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Sitedrivesitedrive.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Archdeskarchdesk.com 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact Compare
eSUBesub.com 17/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.