Transparency alternatives to Aproplan
Other Construction management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Aproplan. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 64 that differ from Aproplan on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Aproplan has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Aproplan” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Aproplan | Found at Aproplan, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CompanyCamcompanycam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CompanyCam | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Daluxdalux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dalux | 52/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Bridgitgobridgit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bridgit | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Procoreprocore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Procore | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Nexvianexvia.com.auSee also Transparency alternatives to Nexvia | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Hero Softwarehero-software.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Hero Software | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| SkillSignalskillsignal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SkillSignal | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| SmartPMsmartpmtech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartPM | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Assignarassignar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Assignar | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Rakenrakenapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Raken | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Bluebeambluebeam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bluebeam | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| O3 Solutionso3.solutionsSee also Transparency alternatives to O3 Solutions | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.