Transparency alternatives to Capmo
Other Construction management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Capmo. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 63 that differ from Capmo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Capmo has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Capmo” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Capmo | Found at Capmo, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nexvianexvia.com.auSee also Transparency alternatives to Nexvia | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Daluxdalux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dalux | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| CompanyCamcompanycam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CompanyCam | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Bridgitgobridgit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bridgit | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Rakenrakenapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Raken | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Assignarassignar.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Assignar | 32/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Bluebeambluebeam.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bluebeam | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Procoreprocore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Procore | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CUBE CDEcube.msSee also Transparency alternatives to CUBE CDE | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| SkillSignalskillsignal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SkillSignal | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Boxcoreboxcore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Boxcore | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Newformanewforma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Newforma | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.