SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Matrix

Other Customer communities vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Matrix. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 29 that differ from Matrix on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Matrix has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Matrix” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at MatrixFound at Matrix, not found there
Bettermodebettermode.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bettermode 83/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Discoursediscourse.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Discourse 61/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Mattermostmattermost.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mattermost 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Higher Logichigherlogic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Higher Logic 65/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Circlecircle.soSee also Transparency alternatives to Circle 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Heartbeatheartbeat.chatSee also Transparency alternatives to Heartbeat 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Hivebritehivebrite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hivebrite 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Zapnitozapnito.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zapnito 43/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Zulipzulip.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zulip 43/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Flockflock.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flock 32/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
Fleepfleep.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Fleep 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Rocket.Chatrocket.chatSee also Transparency alternatives to Rocket.Chat 26/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.