SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Mattermost

Other Customer communities vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Mattermost. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 29 that differ from Mattermost on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Mattermost has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Mattermost” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at MattermostFound at Mattermost, not found there
Bettermodebettermode.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bettermode 83/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Circlecircle.soSee also Transparency alternatives to Circle 61/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Heartbeatheartbeat.chatSee also Transparency alternatives to Heartbeat 52/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Twisttwist.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Twist 26/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Higher Logichigherlogic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Higher Logic 65/100 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Discoursediscourse.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Discourse 61/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Hivebritehivebrite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hivebrite 52/100 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Zapnitozapnito.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zapnito 43/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Zulipzulip.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zulip 43/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Flockflock.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flock 32/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Fleepfleep.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Fleep 30/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Matrixmatrix.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Matrix 22/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.