Alternatives to PosterBooking
Other Digital signage vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that PosterBooking does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from PosterBooking on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
PosterBooking has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and PosterBooking does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and PosterBooking does not | PosterBooking publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appspaceappspace.com | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Poppulopoppulo.com | 61/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| ScreenCloudscreencloud.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Broadsignbroadsign.com | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Disedise.com | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Rocket Alumnirocketalumnisolutions.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Onsignonsign.tv | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| TelemetryTVtelemetrytv.com | 30/100 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| OptiSignsoptisigns.com | 26/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Screenlyscreenly.io | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Carouselcarouselsignage.com | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Navorinavori.com | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.