Transparency alternatives to Workist
Other Document AI and data capture vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Workist. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from Workist on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Workist has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Workist” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Workist | Found at Workist, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypatoshypatos.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hypatos | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Parseurparseur.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Parseur | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Formxformx.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Formx | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Affindaaffinda.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Affinda | 63/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Anyrowanyrow.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Anyrow | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Veryfiveryfi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Veryfi | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Mindeemindee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mindee | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Nanonetsnanonets.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nanonets | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Docsumodocsumo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Docsumo | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Instabaseinstabase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Instabase | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Bdo Digitalocrolus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bdo Digital | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Rossumrossum.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rossum | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.