Alternatives to Cryptpad
Other Document collaboration vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Cryptpad does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Cryptpad on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Cryptpad has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Cryptpad does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Cryptpad does not | Cryptpad publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FigJamfigma.com | 87/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Createlycreately.com | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Conceptboardconceptboard.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Stormboardstormboard.com | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Cacoonulab.com | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Gliffygliffy.com | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Lucidchartlucid.co | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Muralmural.co | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Beautiful.aibeautiful.ai | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Klaxoonklaxoon.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Whimsicalwhimsical.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Ayoaayoa.com | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.