SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Therefore

Other Document management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Therefore. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 65 that differ from Therefore on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Therefore has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Therefore” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at ThereforeFound at Therefore, not found there
Templafytemplafy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Templafy 74/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
CloudFilescloudfiles.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to CloudFiles 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Intralinksintralinks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intralinks 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Onehubonehub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Onehub 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Smallpdfsmallpdf.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smallpdf 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Laserfichelaserfiche.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Laserfiche 52/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
DynaFiledynafile.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DynaFile 43/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Papermarkpapermark.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Papermark 43/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Ademeroademero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ademero 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
PaperOfficepaperoffice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PaperOffice 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Folderitfolderit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Folderit 30/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
SmartVaultsmartvault.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartVault 26/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.