SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Codon docuHive

Other Document management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Codon docuHive. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 52 that differ from Codon docuHive on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Codon docuHive has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Codon docuHive” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Codon docuHiveFound at Codon docuHive, not found there
Templafytemplafy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Templafy 74/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 nothing Compare
CloudFilescloudfiles.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to CloudFiles 70/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 nothing Compare
Intralinksintralinks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intralinks 70/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
Smallpdfsmallpdf.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smallpdf 57/100 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +4 nothing Compare
Laserfichelaserfiche.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Laserfiche 52/100 7 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 nothing Compare
Onehubonehub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Onehub 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
DynaFiledynafile.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DynaFile 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Folderitfolderit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Folderit 43/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Papermarkpapermark.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Papermark 43/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
PaperOfficepaperoffice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PaperOffice 39/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Ademeroademero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ademero 35/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 nothing Compare
Fabasoftfabasoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fabasoft 35/100 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.