Transparency alternatives to Nimbus Cloud DMS
Other Document management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Nimbus Cloud DMS. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 65 that differ from Nimbus Cloud DMS on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Nimbus Cloud DMS has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Nimbus Cloud DMS” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Nimbus Cloud DMS | Found at Nimbus Cloud DMS, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Templafytemplafy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Templafy | 74/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CloudFilescloudfiles.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to CloudFiles | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Intralinksintralinks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intralinks | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Smallpdfsmallpdf.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smallpdf | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Laserfichelaserfiche.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Laserfiche | 52/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| DynaFiledynafile.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DynaFile | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Onehubonehub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Onehub | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Ademeroademero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ademero | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Papermarkpapermark.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Papermark | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Fabasoftfabasoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fabasoft | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| PaperOfficepaperoffice.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PaperOffice | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Documenterodocumentero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Documentero | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.