SaaS Ranking
Menu

eComchain

ecomchain.com · Ecommerce platforms · checked 2026-09-18

9/100FBand F

Rank 29 of 43 in Ecommerce platforms, where the median is 17.

We measured 12 of 12 criteria for eComchain on 2026-09-18. We found 2 with a source and did not find 10 at the addresses we checked. That is a transparency score of 9 out of 100, band F.

Overview

0 days since the newest finding, 0 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria measured in the last 30 days.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

eComchain

ecomchain.com · Ecommerce platforms

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
F 9of 100 Rank 29 of 43

Published commitments2 of 9 found

Measured behaviour0 of 3 found

Checked 2026-09-18. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

The evidence pack carries every criterion with its source, the addresses we checked, the date and the data snapshot id – the four things a procurement file needs and a screenshot loses. We do not issue badges: a badge is the first step towards a paid placement, and there is none here.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that eComchain has no such document.

Where eComchain sits in Ecommerce platforms

  1. A0 0%
  2. B3 7%
  3. C0 0%
  4. D3 7%
  5. E10 23%
  6. F27 63%
43 vendors with a score; 3 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of eComchain is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What they state

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Data processing agreement

weight 3 of 3

No data processing agreement found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-09-18.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://ecomchain.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://ecomchain.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://ecomchain.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://ecomchain.com/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://ecomchain.com/legal/data-processing-addendum – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://ecomchain.com/legal/gdpr – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  7. https://ecomchain.com/trust/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  8. https://ecomchain.com/privacy/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Subprocessor list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-18.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://ecomchain.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://ecomchain.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://ecomchain.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://ecomchain.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://ecomchain.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://ecomchain.com/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  7. https://ecomchain.com/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Data location stated

weight 3 of 3

No statement about data location found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-18.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://ecomchain.com/security – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://ecomchain.com/trust – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://ecomchain.com/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://ecomchain.com/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://ecomchain.com/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://ecomchain.com/compliance – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  7. https://ecomchain.com/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Status page with history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-09-18.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.ecomchain.com/ – The name "status.ecomchain.com" could not be resolved.
  2. https://ecomchain.com/status – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://ecomchain.com.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Public pricing

weight 2 of 3

No public pricing with figures found.

Checked 5 addresses on 2026-09-18.

Show the 5 addresses we checked
  1. https://ecomchain.com/pricing – reached and rendered, no match
  2. https://ecomchain.com/pricing/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://ecomchain.com/plans – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://ecomchain.com/en/pricing – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://ecomchain.com/pricing-plans – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

No enforced HTTPS with HSTS found.

Checked 2 addresses on 2026-09-18.

Show the 2 addresses we checked
  1. http://ecomchain.com/ – HTTP 200, no redirect to HTTPS
  2. https://ecomchain.com/ – no HSTS header

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

No third-party tracking before consent

weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-18.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://ecomchain.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: cdn.jsdelivr.net, cdn.snitcher.com, cdnjs.cloudflare.com, connect.facebook.net, fonts.googleapis.com, fonts.gstatic.com, images.g2crowd.com, in.getclicky.com, js.hs-scripts.com, px.ads.linkedin.com, radar.snitcher.com, region1.analytics.google.com, sc.lfeeder.com, snap.licdn.com, snid.snitcher.com, static.getclicky.com, static.hotjar.com, static.zotabox.com, static2.zotabox.com, stats-v2.zotabox.com, stats.g.doubleclick.net, tr-rc.lfeeder.com, unpkg.com, www.facebook.com, www.google-analytics.com, www.google.de, www.googletagmanager.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-09-18.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://ecomchain.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://ecomchain.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://ecomchain.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://ecomchain.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://ecomchain.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://ecomchain.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  7. https://ecomchain.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  8. https://ecomchain.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-09-18.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://ecomchain.com/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://ecomchain.com/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://ecomchain.com/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://ecomchain.com/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://ecomchain.com/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  6. https://ecomchain.com/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-18.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://ecomchain.com/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 2
✓

Certifications named

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page SOC 2 (unclear from the sentence), SOC 2 Type II (unclear from the sentence).
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    SOC 2 compliance A SOC 2 report is an attestation report that documents an organization’s internal contro

    Read at https://ecomchain.com/compliance

    A SOC 2 report may be either a point-in-time report (Type 1) or cover a period of time (Type 2).

    Read at https://ecomchain.com/compliance

Source: https://ecomchain.com/compliance · checked 2026-09-18

✓

Named privacy contact

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://ecomchain.com/privacy · checked 2026-09-18

History

100 0 2026-09-16: 9 of 1002026-09-18: 9 of 100 2026-09-16 2026-09-18
Score over the last 2 runs we measured eComchain in: 9 (2026-09-16), 9 (2026-09-18).

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.