SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Postmark

Other Email marketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Postmark does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 20 that differ from Postmark on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Postmark has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Postmark does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Postmark does notPostmark publishes, and they do not
Mailgunmailgun.com 83/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
ActiveCampaignactivecampaign.com 78/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 1 Public pricing Compare
Customer.iocustomer.io 80/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 nothing Compare
CleverReachcleverreach.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Klaviyoklaviyo.com 65/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
Mailchimpmailchimp.com 57/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Omnisendomnisend.com 57/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Substacksubstack.com 38/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing Compare
Elastic Emailelasticemail.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
SendGridsendgrid.com 18/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
EmailOctopusemailoctopus.com 43/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Flodeskflodesk.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.